On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:07 PM Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 07:14:13PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > > While comment parsing is a good idea to deal with old codebases > > that used such a comment as documentation for humans, the best > > solution is to use the attribute: > > > > * It is a "real" part of the AST (=> better for tooling). > > This will create a problem for the recent versions of sparse which > support __has_attribute() because sparse falsely pretends to support > this attribute while, to play nice with -Wdeclaration-after-statement, > it needs some adaptation to the parsing (it's actually seen not as a > statement but as a declaration). I'll see to fix it this evening.
No rush Luc! (I have sent the PR to Linus without this two patches for the moment). And thanks a lot for having being so quick to improve sparse to support all these series! Cheers, Miguel
