On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 07:41:26PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> rcu_state does not have a gp_seq_needed field. This comment therefore is
> confusing or incorrect. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <j...@joelfernandes.org>

Good eyes, queued and pushed with edits, thank you!

(Yes, I do have a great deal of experience with punched cards.  Why do
you ask?)

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index 57a937ac51c2..fd2ba3f9eee9 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct rcu_node {
>                                       /*  some rcu_state fields as well as */
>                                       /*  following. */
>       unsigned long gp_seq;   /* Track rsp->rcu_gp_seq. */
> -     unsigned long gp_seq_needed; /* Track rsp->rcu_gp_seq_needed. */
> +     unsigned long gp_seq_needed; /* Track the furthest future gp request 
> seen */
>       unsigned long completedqs; /* All QSes done for this node. */
>       unsigned long qsmask;   /* CPUs or groups that need to switch in */
>                               /*  order for current grace period to proceed.*/
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ union rcu_noqs {
>  struct rcu_data {
>       /* 1) quiescent-state and grace-period handling : */
>       unsigned long   gp_seq;         /* Track rsp->rcu_gp_seq counter. */
> -     unsigned long   gp_seq_needed;  /* Track rsp->rcu_gp_seq_needed ctr. */
> +     unsigned long   gp_seq_needed;  /* Track the furthest future gp request 
> seen */
>       union rcu_noqs  cpu_no_qs;      /* No QSes yet for this CPU. */
>       bool            core_needs_qs;  /* Core waits for quiesc state. */
>       bool            beenonline;     /* CPU online at least once. */
> -- 
> 2.19.0.444.g18242da7ef-goog
> 

Reply via email to