On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 01:57:18PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Eric Biggers <ebigge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > - As much of the data as can be fitted into the buffer will be copied to > > - userspace if the buffer pointer is not NULL. > > - > > - On a successful return, the function will always return the amount of > > data > > - available rather than the amount copied. > > + On success, the function will return the amount of data placed into > > the > > + buffer. > > > > + If the specified buffer is too small, then the size of the buffer > > required > > + will be returned, and it is unspecified whether any data will be > > copied > > + into the buffer. > > How about: > > If the specified buffer is too small, then the size of the buffer > required will be returned. Note that, in this case, the contents of the > buffer may be have been overwritten in some undefined way. > > Otherwise, on success, the function will return the amount of data copied > into the buffer. > > David
I guess that's fine --- either way users can't rely on the contents of the buffer. The man page should use the same wording, though. Should I send a v2 of both patches? Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
