Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger <tom.sae...@oracle.com>
---
 .../RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html     | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git 
a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html 
b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
index e5d0bbd0230b..7394f034be65 100644
--- 
a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
+++ 
b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ grace period also drove it to completion.
 This straightforward approach had the disadvantage of needing to
 account for POSIX signals sent to user tasks,
 so more recent implemementations use the Linux kernel's
-<a 
href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/workqueue.txt";>workqueues</a>.
+<a 
href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst";>workqueues</a>.
 
 <p>
 The requesting task still does counter snapshotting and funnel-lock
-- 
2.14.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to