Hi! > >> Do you think such an improvement could be harmful in some way, > >> even if it was made optional? > > > > Of course, we can make LED timing accurate down to microseconds. It will > > mean increased overhead -- for "improvement" human can not perceive. > > > > If someone has problems with LED delays not being accurate enough... we > > may want to fix it. But that is not the case here, is it? > > AFAIR David was mentioning that the hr_timer support is perceivable
He said that hr_timer support is perceivable _when he is driving
vibration motor_. Which he should not do in the first place.
Yes, if the difference is perceivable with LED in non-crazy
configuration (*), we can take the patch. Is it? Do we have someone
not from Google observing it?
Pavel
(*) emulating PWM using blink trigger counts as "crazy" :-)
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
