On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:54:32AM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:47:55AM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
> >> +static const struct acpi_device_id *xgene_pmu_acpi_match_type(
> >> + const struct acpi_device_id *ids,
> >> + struct acpi_device *adev)
> >> +{
> >> + const struct acpi_device_id *match_id = NULL;
> >> + const struct acpi_device_id *id;
> >> +
> >> + for (id = ids; id->id[0] || id->cls; id++) {
> >> + if (!acpi_match_device_ids(adev, id))
> >> + match_id = id;
> >> + else if (match_id)
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return match_id;
> >> +}
> >
> > I don't believe this look is necessary. AFAICT, acpi_match_device_ids()
> > already iterates over the id table it is given.
>
> The acpi_match_device_ids() function just returns if a device ID is
> available on the given list. It does not return the first matching ID.
> That's the reason I created this function to find the first matching ID.
Ah, I see. Thanks for correcting me!
Can we use acpi_match_device(ids, &adev->dev), or is that the wrong dev?
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
