Hello:
I had someone ask me today whether
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ is covered by GNU GPL or GNU
FDL, and honestly I wasn't sure, as there is actually no clear
indication. There's places where FDL is listed
(https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/media/uapi/fdl-appendix.html),
but that particular instance appears to only cover items in "Linux Media
Infrastructure Userspace API"), or at least that's the implication.
Would it be fair to say documentation is "GNU GPLv2 unless otherwise
indicated?" And if that's not the case (because I'm not sure GPLv2 is a
sane license for documentation), would it make sense to clearly indicate
the documentation license somewhere in the rendered docs?
Best,
Konstantin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
