Hi Rob, On Tuesday 21 March 2017 03:13 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 07:52:51PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Update device tree binding documentation of TI's dra7xx PCI >> controller to include property for enabling unaligned mem access. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti-pci.txt | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti-pci.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti-pci.txt >> index 190828a5f32a..b69dd7dbd29e 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti-pci.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti-pci.txt >> @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ DEVICE MODE >> - interrupts : one interrupt entries must be specified for main interrupt. >> - num-ib-windows : number of inbound address translation windows >> - num-ob-windows : number of outbound address translation windows >> + - ti,syscon-unaligned-access: phandle to the syscon dt node. The 1st >> argument >> + should contain the register offset within syscon >> + and the 2nd argument should contain the bit field >> + for setting the bit to enable unaligned >> + access. > > This should be setup by the firmware/bootloader or some platform code. > Why does the PCI host need to configure this?
That would create a dependency between the bootloader and kernel which is usually avoided in platforms like dra7xx. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
