On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:34 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@s-opensource.com> wrote:
> - use the correct markup to identify each section; > > - Add some blank lines for Sphinx to properly interpret > the markups; > > - Remove a blank space on some paragraphs; > > - Fix the verbatim and bold markups; > > - Cleanup the remaining errors to make Sphinx happy. So I certainly don't have a problem with the changes made to this file, but there is some discomfort at a higher level: > +Last update: > + 2006-01-05 I have to wonder what the value of a document saying how to FTP the patch and move up to 2.6.13 is in 2016. Who knows, there might still be value in a discussion of using the patch tool. But I think we should seriously consider making a "historical" section for documents that are nearing or past their expiration dates. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
