Em Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:24:16 +0200 Hans Verkuil <hansv...@cisco.com> escreveu:
> On 08/19/2016 03:05 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > There are some things there that aren't ok for ReST format. > > > > Fix them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@s-opensource.com> > > OK, so I posted a similar patch for this: > > https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/36376/ > > It's part of one of my pull requests, but I guess you can skip that patch. Sorry, I didn't notice. I'm actually waiting for Jon to merge the remaining patches for the Sphinx rst core before starting handling and merging our patches. I want to avoid having a separate branch for documentation this time. IMHO, my approach is better than you for functions, as it declares functions and struct using the proper macros that are also used by kernel-doc script. Yet, I didn't touch at MAINTAINERS nor I used ``constant`` or :c:type:/:c:func: for references of the functions/struct. Would you care to rebase your patch on the top of mine doing such changes? Thanks! Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
