On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 01:36:17PM +0200, Andrea Gelmini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelm...@gelma.net>

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
> index da51d30..b43847e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ checking of rcu_dereference() primitives:
>       rcu_access_pointer(p):
>               Return the value of the pointer and omit all barriers,
>               but retain the compiler constraints that prevent duplicating
> -             or coalescsing.  This is useful when when testing the
> +             or coalescing. This is useful when when testing the
>               value of the pointer itself, for example, against NULL.
> 
>  The rcu_dereference_check() check expression can be any boolean
> -- 
> 2.8.2.534.g1f66975
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to