Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup

[Cao jin]

Hi jon
    Thanks for your quick respond for my 1st patch here.
On 04/21/2016 05:56 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:09:54 +0800
Cao jin <caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

-  wheel concept, it cannot be 'designed out' without unevitably
-  degrading other portions of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way.
+  wheel concept, it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably
+  degrading other portions of the timers.c code in an acceptable way.

This change is incorrect - "unacceptable" is exactly what the writer
wanted to say here.

*it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably degrading other portions 
of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way*

equals

*it can be 'designed out' ... in an acceptable way*, I think.

So, just from semantics, my feeling is, *it cannot be 'designed out' in 
an acceptable way* is the reason why integration is hard. Am I still wrong?

--
Yours Sincerely,

Cao jin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html