On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Haggai Eran <hagg...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> On 01/03/2016 11:22, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Haggai Eran <hagg...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>>> On 28/02/2016 16:13, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>>>> b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>>>> index 00da80e..54ea8ce 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>>>> @@ -343,28 +343,38 @@ int ib_register_device(struct ib_device *device,
>>>>
>>>> ret = read_port_immutable(device);
>>>> if (ret) {
>>>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "Couldn't create per port immutable data
>>>> %s\n",
>>>> - device->name);
>>>> + pr_warn("Couldn't create per port immutable data %s\n",
>>>> + device->name);
>>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> This change doesn't belong in the patch.
>> I agree, but few warnings are with pr_warn and few with printk just
>> make code look uneven.
>> So I changed printk to pr_warn in same function instead of spinning
>> complete new patch.
> Still, I think it would be better to have such cosmetic changes in a
> separate patch, so that we have a cleaner git history. You can send
> this extra patch separately from this patchset so that Doug can take
> it independently.
o.k.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
