On 26 January 2016 at 11:51, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > Em Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:08:21AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier escreveu: >> On 25 January 2016 at 14:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> >> wrote: >> > Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:12:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >> > escreveu: >> >> Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:46:22PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier escreveu: >> >> > On 14 January 2016 at 14:46, Mathieu Poirier >> >> > <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> > I can't queue this patch for 4.6 without at least a reviewed by from >> >> > you. >> >> >> >> This one I remember, looks ugly, the name set_max_cpu_num() looks >> >> strange, when that was restricted (static) to that cpumap.c file, it >> >> wasn't a problem, exporting it for wider usage looks bad. >> >> >> >> You've been waiting for this for quite a while, it seems, lemme stop >> >> what I am doing to check this... >> > >> > So, please check the patch below, what you need then is just to use >> > cpu__max_cpu(). >> >> I like your approach - thanks for the review. I will spin V9 when I >> have received Adrian's comments. > > I'll take that as an Acked-by: and since this improves the current > situation by hiding needlessly exported global variables, I'll get it in > now, thanks.
I would have added this code in my patchset with the right authorship - whatever works best for you. Thanks, Mathieu > > - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
