On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 02:10:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:45:49PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:47:27PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Still building, but noticed this on x86_64:
> > > >
> > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests :
> > > > FAILED!
> > > > 106: perf trace BTF general tests :
> > > > FAILED!
> > > > 107: perf trace exit race :
> > > > Ok
> > > > 108: perf trace record and replay :
> > > > FAILED!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The first doesn´t help that much with verbose mode, haven't checked if
> > > > before this series it was failing :-\
> > > >
> > > > root@x1:~# perf test -vvv 105
> > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests:
> > > > --- start ---
> > > > test child forked, pid 19411
> > > > Checking if vmlinux exists
> > > > Tracing syscall landlock_add_rule
> > > > ---- end(-1) ----
> > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests :
> > > > FAILED!
> > > > root@x1:~#
This one is now ok:
0.004 ( 0.000 ms): perf/200342 landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd: 11,
rule_type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, rule_attr: 0x7ffd649bd0d0, flags: 45) = -1
EINVAL (Invalid argument)
root@number:~# perf test enum
105: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok
root@number:~#
now looking at:
root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvvvv 106
106: perf trace BTF general tests:
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 200467
Checking if vmlinux BTF exists
Testing perf trace's string augmentation
String augmentation test failed
---- end(-1) ----
106: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED!
root@number:~#
No clue from the test, reading its source code now to see where it is
failing to try and reproduce the problem.
- Arnaldo
