Hi, At 2024-11-08 22:25:13, "Thomas Gleixner" <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: >David! > >On Sun, Nov 03 2024 at 16:05, David Wang wrote: > >$Subject: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: ... > >That's not a valid subsystem prefix.
copy that~ > >> seq_printf is costy, when stress reading /proc/interrupts, profiling >> indicates >> seq_printf takes about ~47% of show_interrupts samples: > >Also please follow the documentation for denoting functions in change >logs: > >https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#function-references-in-changelogs > copy that~ >> arch/alpha/kernel/irq.c | 8 +-- >> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 4 +- >> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 +- >> arch/csky/kernel/smp.c | 4 +- >> arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c | 2 +- >> arch/parisc/kernel/irq.c | 34 ++++++------ >> arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 44 ++++++++-------- >> arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 3 +- >> arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 4 +- >> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.c | 12 ++--- >> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c | 4 +- >> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> arch/xtensa/kernel/irq.c | 2 +- >> arch/xtensa/kernel/smp.c | 4 +- >> kernel/irq/proc.c | 6 ++- > >There is no dependency on these changes. So please split them up into >seperate patches for core and the individual architectures.an Thanks for all the review, I will make a patchset for this. > >Thanks, > > tglx David
