Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2017, 11:00:11 CET schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert,
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:24:47PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote: > > Hi Herbert et al, > > > > attached are two patches where each patch has a different approach to copy > > the AAD in the algif_aead operation. I would like to hear your opinion > > which approach should be taken. > > > > The patch 0001-crypto-algif_aead-copy-AAD-from-src-to-dst_separate.patch > > simply copies the AAD over from TX SGL to RX SGL. The pro is that the > > patch is small. The con is that this approach does *not* provide an > > in-place crypto operation. > > I prefer this patch with the proviso that it copy the whole thing > instead of just the AD. That way you can just feed the dst memory > to crypto_aead for in-place operation. Of course you have to mangle > the tag data onto the dst SG list for decryption but it shouldn't > be too hard. I thought that is exactly the second patch. It copies the entire data to the dst SGL and extends the SGL with the tag in case of decryption. Ciao Stephan
