On 12.12.18 г. 20:05 ч., [email protected] wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
> 
> Comparing the content of the pages in the range to deduplicate is now done
> by the generic helper generic_remap_file_range_prep(), which takes care of

very minor nit: the checks are performed in generic_remap_checks which
is called by generic_remap_file_range_prep. But even without this change
LGTM.

> ensuring we do not compare/deduplicate undefined data beyond a file's eof
> (range from eof to the next block boundary). So remove these checks which
> are now redundant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 19 ++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 4e9efc93340e..3a27efa2b955 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -3206,31 +3206,16 @@ static void btrfs_double_inode_lock(struct inode 
> *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
>       inode_lock_nested(inode2, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
>  }
>  
> -static int btrfs_extent_same_range(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
> +static int btrfs_extent_same_range(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len,
>                                  struct inode *dst, u64 dst_loff)
>  {
> -     u64 bs = BTRFS_I(src)->root->fs_info->sb->s_blocksize;
>       int ret;
> -     u64 len = olen;
> -
> -     if (loff + len == src->i_size)
> -             len = ALIGN(src->i_size, bs) - loff;
> -     /*
> -      * For same inode case we don't want our length pushed out past i_size
> -      * as comparing that data range makes no sense.
> -      *
> -      * This effectively means we require aligned extents for the single
> -      * inode case, whereas the other cases allow an unaligned length so long
> -      * as it ends at i_size.
> -      */
> -     if (dst == src && len != olen)
> -             return -EINVAL;
>  
>       /*
>        * Lock destination range to serialize with concurrent readpages().
>        */
>       lock_extent(&BTRFS_I(dst)->io_tree, dst_loff, dst_loff + len - 1);
> -     ret = btrfs_clone(src, dst, loff, olen, len, dst_loff, 1);
> +     ret = btrfs_clone(src, dst, loff, len, len, dst_loff, 1);
>       unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(dst)->io_tree, dst_loff, dst_loff + len - 1);
>  
>       return ret;
> 

Reply via email to