On 15.06.2017 04:17, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Nikolay, > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.9-rc8] > [cannot apply to btrfs/next kdave/for-next next-20170614] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > help improve the system] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nikolay-Borisov/btrfs-Use-btrfs_space_info_used-instead-of-opencoding-it/20170615-084940 > config: x86_64-randconfig-x012-201724 (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901 > reproduce: > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=x86_64 > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c: In function 'btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size': >>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4918:9: error: implicit declaration of function >>> 'btrfs_space_info_used' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > used = btrfs_space_info_used(space_info, true); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
This patch builds cleanly on latest linux master and it's based off that tree. I don't see why it's being applied to 4.9-rc8. > > vim +/btrfs_space_info_used +4918 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > > 4912 > 4913 to_reclaim = min_t(u64, num_online_cpus() * SZ_1M, > SZ_16M); > 4914 if (can_overcommit(root, space_info, to_reclaim, > 4915 BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL)) > 4916 return 0; > 4917 >> 4918 used = btrfs_space_info_used(space_info, true); > 4919 > 4920 if (can_overcommit(root, space_info, SZ_1M, > BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL)) > 4921 expected = > div_factor_fine(space_info->total_bytes, 95); > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
