On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:44:31AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 7.06.2017 21:09, Sargun Dhillon wrote: > > This patch is a small performance optimization to get rid of a spin > > lock, where instead an atomic64_t can be used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <[email protected]> > > I've already sent similar patch 1 month ago: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9720999/
Another hint is to look to the linux-next or to my kernel.org for-next branch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
