Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Jorge Godoy wrote: > >> Na verdade, nem os fontes eles s�o obrigados a disponibilizar. Se voc� >> comprar o pacote com bin�rios, voc� tem acesso aos fontes. Se voc� n�o >> comprar, n�o � necess�rio que te d�em acesso a nada. > > Ummm, o GPL disse que os codigos fontes tem que ser accesivel > ao todo mundo, n�o s� aos pessoas que tem os binarios:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic Does the GPL require that source code of modified versions be posted to the public? The GPL does not require you to release your modified version. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization. But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the users, under the GPL. Thus, the GPL gives permission to release the modified program in certain ways, and not in other ways; but the decision of whether to release it is up to you. Conforme consta no segundo par�grafo do FAQ, as modifica��es devem ser disponibilizadas para os usu�rios que tiveram contato com a c�pia modificada. Sds, -- Godoy. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Assinantes em 02/12/2002: 2275 Mensagens recebidas desde 07/01/1999: 192287 Historico e [des]cadastramento: http://linux-br.conectiva.com.br Assuntos administrativos e problemas com a lista: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
