On 9/30/19 2:52 AM, Jackie Liu wrote:
> Cool performance improvement, Reviewed-by: Jackie Liu <[email protected]>

Thanks for the review.

> BTW, we always use s->needs_lock to determine if it is in async. Is it
> possible to consider replacing it directly with s->in_async?

Yeah I think that'd be a good cleanup, would make it clearer without
needing comments to say that they are equivalent.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Reply via email to