On 9/19/19 4:19 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:45:46AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> From: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
>>
>> When blk_mq_request_issue_directly() returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE we
>> need to requeue the I/O, but adding it to the global request list
>> will mess up with the passed-in request list. So re-add the request
>
> We always add request to hctx->dispatch_list after .queue_rq() returns
> BLK_STS_RESOURCE or BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE, so what is the messing up?
>
>> to the original list and leave it to the caller to handle situations
>> where the list wasn't completely emptied.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> block/blk-mq.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index b038ec680e84..44ff3c1442a4 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -1899,8 +1899,7 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct
>> blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>> if (ret != BLK_STS_OK) {
>> if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE ||
>> ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
>> - blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq,
>> - list_empty(list));
>> + list_add(list, &rq->queuelist);
>
> This way may let this request(DONTPREP set) to be merged with other rq
> or bio, and potential data corruption may be caused, please see commit:
>
> c616cbee97ae blk-mq: punt failed direct issue to dispatch list
>
Ok.
What triggered this patch is this code:
insert:
if (bypass_insert)
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, run_queue);
return BLK_STS_OK;
}
static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
struct request *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie)
{
blk_status_t ret;
int srcu_idx;
might_sleep_if(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);
hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false, true);
if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, true);
IE blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() will be called always once we hit the
'insert' label, the only difference being the second parameter of that
function.
I'd rather have the sequence consolidated, preferably by calling
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() in one place only, and not scatter the
calls all over the code.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
[email protected] +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer
