On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 10:00:55PM +0800, Hongbo Li wrote: > > 在 2025/5/31 7:16, Kent Overstreet 写道: > > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:19:32PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Summary: I am curious why "ls -l" reports 16 EiB as the size of a > > > directory entry. As to what I can see the filesystem is perfectly fine. > > > > > > Kernel 6.15, self compiled. 320 GiB BCacheFS on LUKS encrypted LVM. > > > Checksums are xxhash. Filesystem was created recently on self compiled > > > 6.15-rc7 with self-compiled bcachefs tools from git tag 1.25.2. "bcachefs" > > > reports 1.25.1 as version number. > > > > > > I have a directory entry that according to ls -l is quite big: > > > > > > drwxrwxr-x 5 martin martin 18446744073709551400 DATE DIRECTORY > > Yes, this is due to a leftover from the directory i_size patchset that > > had to be reverted. As long as it's not causing issues it'll be a bit > > before I get to it, I've got higher priority bugs I'm working on right > > now (as usual). > > > > Hongbo, whatever happened to that patchset? I thought you were going to > > fix it so we could get it back in later? > I'm very sorry for the directory i_size problem. And this work has been > postponed recently due to my other internal works. Yeah, I will get back to > this work after this Dragon Boat festival. I'm really sorry I haven't dealt > with it sooner.
Ok, don't worry about it, the rest of it isn't urgent, just the i_size fixes for the revert - I'll try to get that out today.
