On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 10:34:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 10:32:49AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:12:22PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > > 02a22be3c0003af08df510cba3d79d00c6495b74: > > > > > > bcachefs: bch2_ioctl_subvolume_destroy() fixes (2025-04-03 16:13:53 > > > -0400) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > git://evilpiepirate.org/bcachefs.git tags/bcachefs-for-6.14-2025-05-02 > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 52b17bca7b20663e5df6dbfc24cc2030259b64b6: > > > > > > bcachefs: Remove incorrect __counted_by annotation (2025-05-02 21:09:51 > > > -0400) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > bcachefs fixes for 6.15 > > > > > > remove incorrect counted_by annotation, fixing FORTIFY_SOURCE crashes > > > that have been hitting arch users > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Alan Huang (1): > > > bcachefs: Remove incorrect __counted_by annotation > > > > > > fs/bcachefs/xattr_format.h | 8 +++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > You list 1 patch here, but if I pull this, I see 2 patches against the > > latest linux-6.14.y branch. When rebased, the "additional" one goes > > away, as you already sent that to us in the past, so I'll just take the > > one that's left here, but please, make this more obvious what is > > happening. > > Also, as this single commit is a revert of something in 6.12.y, should > it also be applied there to remove any false-positives happening with > those users?
yup, pull request inc (missed this because all the reports have been on 6.14, but no doubt that's because gcc-15 has only recently been rolling out)
