On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 07:15:37PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
> getting ready to enable it, globally.
> 
> Use the `DEFINE_FLEX()` helper for on-stack definitions of a flexible
> structure where the size of the flexible-array member is known at
> compile-time, and refactor the rest of the code, accordingly.
> 
> So, with these changes, fix the following warning:
> 
> fs/bcachefs/disk_accounting.c:429:51: warning: structure containing a 
> flexible array member is not at the end of another structure 
> [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end]

We also have bch_replicas_padded, does that also need a fix?

And, DEFINE_FLEX() is gross, can we try to stop reinventing language
syntax with macros?

Could we not have done this with an __attribute__(())?

Or just swap the anonymous struct for a union, since that's apparently
what DEFINE_FLEX() does?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/bcachefs/disk_accounting.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/disk_accounting.c b/fs/bcachefs/disk_accounting.c
> index 7be71952425c..381e666679d2 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/disk_accounting.c
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/disk_accounting.c
> @@ -425,24 +425,22 @@ int bch2_fs_replicas_usage_read(struct bch_fs *c, 
> darray_char *usage)
>  
>       percpu_down_read(&c->mark_lock);
>       darray_for_each(acc->k, i) {
> -             struct {
> -                     struct bch_replicas_usage r;
> -                     u8 pad[BCH_BKEY_PTRS_MAX];
> -             } u;
> +             DEFINE_FLEX(struct bch_replicas_usage, u, r.devs, r.nr_devs,
> +                         BCH_BKEY_PTRS_MAX);
>  
> -             if (!accounting_to_replicas(&u.r.r, i->pos))
> +             if (!accounting_to_replicas(&u->r, i->pos))
>                       continue;
>  
>               u64 sectors;
>               bch2_accounting_mem_read_counters(acc, i - acc->k.data, 
> &sectors, 1, false);
> -             u.r.sectors = sectors;
> +             u->sectors = sectors;
>  
> -             ret = darray_make_room(usage, replicas_usage_bytes(&u.r));
> +             ret = darray_make_room(usage, replicas_usage_bytes(u));
>               if (ret)
>                       break;
>  
> -             memcpy(&darray_top(*usage), &u.r, replicas_usage_bytes(&u.r));
> -             usage->nr += replicas_usage_bytes(&u.r);
> +             memcpy(&darray_top(*usage), u, replicas_usage_bytes(u));
> +             usage->nr += replicas_usage_bytes(u);
>       }
>       percpu_up_read(&c->mark_lock);
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reply via email to