It's amazing how some of our citizens are so casual with money. Why don't
some of the Lincoln gazillionaires simply contribute and write off a mil
each.

Kind Regards,

Scott Clary
617-968-5769

Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors

On Mon, Jun 9, 2025, 11:48 AM Karla Gravis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Many towns (see Concord and Winchester) run excellent after-school
> programs within their school buildings using shared space. And those towns
> don’t even have the benefit of a recently built $98 million school,
> designed for 700 students but currently serving only about 550, like we do.
> We also have new information that is ominous: the CC project is already at
> a cost overrun and it hasn't even broken ground. Are we confident that this
> is the last time we are going to be asked for more money?
>
> Concerns about setup logistics don’t justify a $27 million facility.
> Schools regularly host after-hours programs, and those challenges can be
> managed with planning, not new construction.
>
> And let’s not forget: the Community Center would also bring more traffic
> and drivers to the school campus right during peak times, introducing new
> safety concerns that haven’t been fully addressed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karla
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 10:55 AM Bob Kupperstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> LEAP can function in the school building on a temporary basis, but no one
>> should think this is an optimal or even adequate solution.
>>
>> LEAP, in its own building, has dedicated space for educational, artistic,
>> recreational, tech and media activities.   In the school building, they
>> would not 'own' any space - so anything they use on a daily basis would
>> have to be set up and stored away each day.   This puts an unrealistic
>> burden on staff and creates logistical issues with the setup needing to
>> happen just as the school is emptying out and the clean-up/storage having
>> to happen during the pick-up hours, while the students have a range of
>> pickup times.  The activities and programs that make LEAP such a great
>> after-school program would have to be scaled back.
>>
>> I can also imagine safety/security issues, with students in the school
>> building after most school staff have left, leaving large parts of the
>> building unmonitored.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Bob
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 12:36 AM Karla Gravis <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>> We’ve already set aside $6.75 million for the Community Center, and now
>>> we're being told we can afford to spend another $2.3 million from reserves,
>>> without any impact to town services. *That means if the project is
>>> voted down, a total of $9 million could safely be returned to taxpayers*.
>>> For the average household, that’s roughly $5,000 back, plus avoiding a $515
>>> annual payment for the next 30 years. How is using surplus funds to deliver
>>> real tax relief *not* financially responsible?
>>>
>>
>
>> Leap can remain in our brand-new school building as it will be hosted
>>> there for the next two years anyway.
>>>
>>> Karla Gravis
>>> Weston Rd
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> From: Sara Lupkas <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 10:53 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Vote No to the Community Center, save
>>>> yourself a tax payment!
>>>> To: Listserv Listserv <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Cuetos wrote: "After adjusting for structurally inflated budget 
>>>> lines, our true operating budget is likely closer to $46–47M—implying a 
>>>> reserve target of around $7M. That leaves as much as $18M in excess 
>>>> reserves available."
>>>>
>>>> What is meant by structurally inflated budget lines and how are you 
>>>> calculating our "true operating budget"? Implying that citizens should 
>>>> somehow equate not passing the Community Center Warrant article with the 
>>>> town not needing to collect taxes in the fall seems a huge reach and not 
>>>> very financially responsible for our town. And if our reserves are so 
>>>> healthy, why is there even an argument against allocating an additional 
>>>> amount to cover the Community Center shortfall?
>>>>
>>>> Let's also not forget that if the Community Center somehow fails now, we 
>>>> would still need to renovate Bemis and the LEAP pods, so this wouldn't 
>>>> free up *that much* in the town budget. This is reminiscent of the first 
>>>> school building project getting voted down and then a more expensive 
>>>> project (with no state matching funds) finally passing years later.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Sara Lupkas*
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to [email protected].
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to