We usually are not so casual with our money…or wetlands. We require flagging for all sorts of things-sales, work on property, etc.
Given the 2005 “study” (not flagging) that was done, how much of the proposed restriction is wet and how much is dry? Of the dry, how much will be buildable, and how much might be used for other purposes, eg. septic system/drainage field. These are straightforward questions that no one, to date, appears able to answer. I believe it fair to ask, and fair to say that there are reservations about spending $1 million without having an answer. > On Jun 3, 2025, at 12:27 PM, Joseph Kolchinsky <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I get that - and maybe you will persuade someone to fund a wetland study > before the vote. Please keep us posted on that effort. > > In lieu of that, let's posit that 100% of Farrington is now wetlands. > Ignoring any other ramification of that result, doesn't that prove the > central point that wetland boundaries are unreliable and CRs are the only > permanent tool we have to lock down land use? In a few decades the wetlands > can shift again? > > Joey
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to [email protected]. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
