Hi Louis - I think you meant that YOUR response does not endorse a
viewpoint.  I thought you meant that MY response does not endorse a
viewpoint.  I was responding from my phone and didn't see the italics.

I may have misread your note, and if so, I apologize.

Seth I Rosen
Cell: 617-771-5602
Email: [email protected]


On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 12:15 PM Seth Rosen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Louis, that is an important distinction and I appreciate you pointing
> it out.
>
> While the thresholds for approval are important, I don’t think that’s
> germane in the context of my note. I feel my viewpoint was unambiguously
> expressed.
>
> Seth
>
> On May 4, 2023, at 12:00 PM, Louis Zipes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 
> *This response does not endorse a viewpoint.*
>
> *Such is the democratic process.  The folks who feel strongly about this
> will show up in force and can be a majority of the vote despite being a
> minority of the town.  The folks who do not show up will be paying most of
> the bill.*
>
> If you are referring to the final funding vote that would be coming next
> year, then remember that just like with the initial vote last November it
> is not a 'majority', at least how most people would understand a majority
> to be (50% plus one) that will decide on the eventual project's funding. To
> approve funding it will take a *super-*majority, during the Town Meeting
> part of the vote, so actually the people that will be in favor of it will
> need to turn out more voters than the people opposed to it. Apologies if
> you were not referring to that part.
>
> <image.png>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:54 AM Seth Rosen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ned, I agree with you and Sarah.  Candidly this was my fear and why I
>> was such a vocal opponent of authorizing the funds.
>>
>> What was green-lighted to be an exploration of various alternatives is
>> rapidly turning into a foregone conclusion that will cost at least $12.5M,
>> with options up to $25M or more.
>>
>> For example, I am quite certain that no one is going to propose a $3 or
>> $4m renovation of the pods and attendant alternative uses of other
>> pre-existing spaces. I’d be most supportive of something along those lines,
>> as I think it’s prudent, responsive to the community’s needs, correctly
>> sized in proportion to our population, and fiscally responsible.  But that
>> proposal is not coming.
>>
>> Such is the democratic process.  The folks who feel strongly about this
>> will show up in force and can be a majority of the vote despite being a
>> minority of the town.  The folks who do not show up will be paying most of
>> the bill.
>>
>> If folks feel such a large expenditure is imprudent, they will need to
>> show up to vote it down.
>>
>> Seth
>>
>>
>> > On May 4, 2023, at 10:25 AM, Edward Young via Lincoln <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I certainly heard what Sarah heard at the Spc. Town Meeting.
>> > The process we have seen to date is not the process I expected from the
>> discussion at the meeting.
>> >
>> > Sarah wrote:
>> >
>> > "And, finally, I respectfully disagree on the sense of the amendment
>> passed at Spc. Town Meeting.
>> > My read was there was a clear desire for continued use and potential
>> expansion of use of alternative spaces for programming?an expanded use of
>> spaces off campus.
>> > I am curious what others heard."
>> > --
>> > The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> > To post, send mail to [email protected].
>> > Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> > Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> >
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to