>From 2012, when the town declined to move forward:

On June 5, 2012, the OPM presented the final project budget to the School
Building
Committee and School Committee, in the amount of $49,956,540, which included
another update from MSBA that increased the maintenance incentive points
from 1 to
1.82 resulting in the Town of Lincoln share of $28,967,568. On June 5,
2012, the School
Building Committee approved the final project scope and budget for the
Lincoln School
project in the amount of $49,956,540 and recommended approval to the
Lincoln School
Committee, which also approved the project scope and budget.


So $49M -- of which $29M would be paid for by the town -- became $94M.
Maybe more accurate to say that in fact Lincoln's share of the bill tripled?

My point, and I promise this is the last time I am going to make it, is
this: An $11M "luxury" project was set aside not even 5 years ago, and is
now being considered for $25M. Somehow, a number of people have landed on
$15M or somewhere in that range as the target for a stripped down version
of the same project. Maybe that's the answer that everybody can agree on.

What seems clear as a bell from the last 10 years of working towards both
the school and the Community Center, is that if the process is stopped, and
started again -- for the sake of considering Lincoln Station, or some
atomized version of town services, or whatever people throw at the wall --
we may get very little for a whole lot more.




On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:23 AM Carol Ryan <urch...@comcast.net> wrote:

> I think the cost of the school ultimately doubled because the town lost
> the offer of state funding.
>
> Carol R
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 30, 2022, at 11:11 AM, Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sara:
>
> Do not try to contort the meaning of my words and frame me as insensitive.
> Don’t.
>
> I didn’t say that I think $25 million is something to sneeze at. I said it
> will seem like peanuts if we delay, ie when the town is presented with a
> 40M price tag down the road.
>
> The history of these projects has shown that 11M can balloon to 25. The
> first school vote was for roughly half what the new school ultimately cost.
> That’s mostly the result of waiting, and little else.
>
> Lis
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 30, 2022, at 9:19 AM, Sara Mattes <samat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Calling $25 million “peanuts” is a bit much.
> While it may be “ peanuts” to you, a significant portion of our population
> would find it otherwise.
> And, to date, no one is talking about the Town operating budgets and what
> they will look like, going forward- after we address teachers contract, the
> hiring a new Superintendent, changes in Town Office staffing and the
> impacts of inflation across the board.
>
> I suspect we will see the need for an override to support the staffing
> needs.
>
> That is part of the total tax package that has an impact on individual
> households.
>
> So, what may be “ peanuts” to you, may have serious and crushing impacts
> on others.
>
> We need to be mindful and sensitive to that reality.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 30, 2022, at 9:05 AM, Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sara:
> If this process is delayed or stopped entirely, again, the price tag for
> needs may well exceed current “wants” — many of which, judging by the
> survey results the CCBC circulated yesterday, are pragmatic, and reflect a
> community’s needs in 2022, not 2012.
> $25 million will seem like peanuts when it’s time to vote on whatever the
> next iteration of this process is 5 or 10 years down the line. And people
> will surely wonder then, if the vote is for a center in some unknown
> location near Donelan’s, why it isn’t sited at Hartwell?
> And around and around and around we can go, forever.
> Lis
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 30, 2022, at 8:51 AM, Sara Mattes <samat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That was then, this is now.
> We have gone through some radical changes in the last several years.
> Our economy is volatile.
> Our work lives have changed, as have commuting patterns.
>
> Should put our fingers in our ears, hands over our eyes and act as if it
> is 2012 all over again ?
>
> We need to be more flexible and creative to meet the needs ( and be
> careful about “ wants”) of the town in 2022 and beyond.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 30, 2022, at 8:41 AM, Sara Mattes <samat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Times have changed, and so must we.
>
> There is an opportunity tonight to be more creative.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 30, 2022, at 8:26 AM, DJCP <djcp0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Oh great, let's wash 10 years of work down the tube so we can start on a
> new project.
> Diana
> Giles Rd
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 8:16 AM <jrob...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello friends, I will *not *be voting in favor of the community center
>> project now… for several reasons explained below.  If these considerations
>> and others you have give you pause, I hope you will join those of us who
>> are interested in further discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> First, Lincoln’s once in  a generation Comprehensive Plan, approved at
>> Town Meeting ~ten years ago prioritized revitalizing  our South Lincoln
>> commercial center. *Without a vibrant place to gather, we risk becoming
>> an inert, mono-culture suburb,* of increasingly high priced single
>> family homes and residents who can afford them. A vital Mall at our center
>> would be a place to gather, meet with friends, and exchange ideas with
>> others who have diverse backgrounds and views.  Before locating a COA or
>> Community Center building at the school property we should evaluate its
>> potential to jump-start and support commercial and civic growth at the mall
>> and help Lincoln slowly and steadily transition into the dynamic community
>> we can be. It’s time.
>>
>>
>>
>> We haven’t had a thorough review of town goals or prioritized them since
>> the Comprehensive Plan. If we choose to ignore the last Comprehensive Plan,
>> let’s plan again. Let’s agree on priorities.
>>
>>
>>
>> There seems to be an ongoing, important, and complex discussion re the
>> distinctions and requirements of a community center vs. a facility for our
>> Council on Aging program….prudence dictates these  be thoroughly studied
>> and resolved before being considered for funding by town meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> And this project will cause real estate taxes to increase above the rate
>> of inflation, again. It will be particularly troubling now for seniors
>> living on a fixed income
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Let’s consider/reconsider these matters fully before we vote for a
>> community center or a COA facility at school property. Let’s get this
>> right. Please consider voting No.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best, Joe
>>
>> Joe Robbat
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to