There has been a bit of discussion regarding LIncoln's property taxes
compared to other towns. One reason taxes may be higher than similar towns
is our low housing density.

Lincoln has consciously and deliberately limited density with land
acquisition, zoning regulations, agricultural easements and more.

The result is that there are fewer houses to distribute fixed costs. If you
have two similar towns with the same number of miles of road, the less
housing-dense town will pay more per family to maintain those roads. The
same goes for many other services provided by the town.

All of this wonderful open space that we all enjoy is not free.

------------------------------
Here are some statistics from this site
<http://zipatlas.com/us/ma/city-comparison/population-density.htm> (not
sure of the date but I assume it does not change quickly):

*Town    Population / sq. mile*
Bedford 926.37
Wayland 819.52
Sudbury 683.63
Weston  664.03
Concord 656.11
Lincoln 359.11

Our limited commercial base is also a factor.
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to