I cannot believe given recent news that this conversation has devolved to the point of invoking John Quincy Adams. As if it even remotely matters what a privileged white male who died hundreds of years ago thinks, or even that anyone short of a Supreme Court Justice has the ability to divine his thoughts. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄(And what would he think of me communicating via emoji??!!) Diana Giles Rd
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022, 5:27 PM Gordon Woodington <alpinemeado...@gmail.com> wrote: > Horse hooves promote water absorption by their imprint, a good thing, not > run-off as bike ruts do. So I think Quincy would be ok. I will bet that > he would not like bikes be permitted on the trails in Adams Woods. > "Original intent" to use a recently invoked term. Who will foot the bill > to repair bike rut damage? Yet another unprovisioned expense. > > Gordon Woodington > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 12:15 PM Leslie Turek <leslie.tu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >>For example, I see no need to allow them in the idyllic Adams Woods. >> Quincy would roll over in his grave. >> >> I'm not taking a stand for or against bikes on the trails, but I have to >> say this statement made me giggle a bit. According to Tom Gumbart, who used >> to lead our conservation walks through Adams Woods, some of the trails >> there are depressed below grade because Adams and his friends used to >> gallop horses down the narrow trails. The 19th-century equivalent to dirt >> bikes? So not sure he would be rolling over in his grave. >> >> Leslie Turek >> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 11:43 AM John Kimball <selen...@earthlink.net> >> wrote: >> >>> John Kimball, here since 1972. I have voted for every conservation >>> purchase since, and have very little sympathy for bikes on conservation >>> land. Bikes do not use the roadside paths but feel entitled to use the >>> roads, and I have no confidence that they would confine themselves to >>> approved conservation trails. For example, I see no need to allow them in >>> the idyllic Adams Woods. Quincy would roll over in his grave. >>> Speed seems to be the norm for bikes and the thrill of going downhill >>> over rocks and roots. Look out below for all mere pedestrians. Bikes should >>> not be allowed on any narrow paths where they may run into walkers and >>> especially children. Bikes and dogs are even more incompatible. I strongly >>> oppose the vast proposed expansion of bike trails. >>> -- >>> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org. >>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/. >>> Browse the archives at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >>> Change your subscription settings at >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >>> >>> -- >> The LincolnTalk mailing list. >> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org. >> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/. >> Browse the archives at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. >> Change your subscription settings at >> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >> >> -- > The LincolnTalk mailing list. > To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org. > Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/. > Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/ > . > Change your subscription settings at > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. > >
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org. Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
