You raise a good point, Gordon.  Maybe we *should* give up 2 acre zoning!

On Sun, Jun 26, 2022, 6:50 PM Gordon Woodington <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yes, I would keep the level of bike trails at the current level.
>
> I am against "incrementalism", since step after step it ultimately causes
> irreversible loss despite "good intentions" and inertia to reversion is
> ultimately insurmountable.
> There are many examples in US where different users are separated
> physically, to functionally limit interaction without dependence on
> "good behavior", without it being "unfair" or whatever the negative
> adjective chosen is.
> Once the place for and the peace of nature is lost where will humanity
> be?  We are part of nature, not separate from it.  Despite the world's
> proclivity, hell bent on destroy the nature that would keep us alive and
> well. Destruction little bit by little bit.
>
> There are plenty of bike trails in and all around Lincoln already.
> Might as well give up 2 acre zoning in Lincoln.  The arguments really are
> not fundamentally different structurally: exclusion to some category of
> people.
>
> Gordon Woodington
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 6:11 PM Andy Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So are people just against bikes at Mt. Misery or bikes in general?
>>
>> Lincoln has 80+ miles of trails (
>> https://www.lincolntown.org/245/Conservation).  The increase of trails
>> that are accessible to bikes from 8-19 miles still restricts mountain
>> biking to only ~24% of the trails that exist in the town (up from 10%).
>> So there are still 61+ miles of trails in the town to explore if you
>> REALLY want to avoid mountain bikes.  Posts seem to imply that bikes would
>> be rampant over all of Lincoln, but that’s not really the proposal that was
>> presented.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 6:05 PM Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I am a jogger, runner & Nordic skier.
>>>
>>> I believe that it is always proper etiquette to announce yourself when
>>> you are coming up behind someone. The faster you are moving (biking,
>>> running, fast paced skiing) the more important it is to announce yourself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, June 26, 2022, 5:58 PM, Gordon Woodington <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> True Johanna, though these ones you mention do not all have the same
>>> jarring effect as bikers who never announce themselves or do so way too
>>> late and inconsiderately.   I was on the trails at Mt. Misery yesterday,
>>> and had a nice conversation with a dog walker from Bedford.  He comes to
>>> Lincoln for it's more quiet, peaceful experience, and less crowded, for
>>> both his well behaved dog and himself. Unsolicited, he expressed issuse
>>> with "arrogant bikers" as he described them.  Our specialness will be lost
>>> if Lincoln homogenizes to be the lowest common denominator to be like other
>>> towns, if Lincoln helds to this as "the way to go".  I pray that Lincoln
>>> does not go this way, rather keeps its difference, its diversification, in
>>> the face of pressure to lose it.
>>>
>>> There is history and wisdom in Lincoln about what happened negatively in
>>> the past.  We should take that all to heart. Not to yield to yet another
>>> experiment, one which also had no adequate procedure and funding in place
>>> even to evaluate/compensate for the proposed changes.
>>>
>>> I second Colleen Katsuki's posting wholeheartedly.
>>>
>>> Gordon Woodington
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 5:40 PM Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> In all of these discussions let’s please not forget joggers, runners,
>>> cross-country skiers, & snow shoers…
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, June 26, 2022, 5:19 PM, Colleen Katsuki <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I always wait a little to see what everybody has to say before I chime
>>> in. My former husband David and I moved to Lincoln in 1994 because of
>>> the conservation land. I could track deer out by back door! It was
>>> wonderful. David soon joined the conservation commission and served for
>>> many years. One issue that came up early was that of dogs off leash at
>>> Mount Misery. One off leash dog caused a horse to rear up, fortunately
>>> not injuring the rider and other dogs jumped on small children causing
>>> them much distress. Because Mount misery has plenty of parking, it was
>>> the focus of that discussion. One evening after the con com meeting Dave
>>> came home and poured himself stiff one. I said :" They have driven you
>>> to drink." And he laughed and said "Yes." In true Lincoln fashion there
>>> was much heated discussion, but eventually a good Lincoln compromise was
>>> made. Dogs were allowed off leash on certain trails at Mount MIsery and
>>> not on others.  Of course that issue has never been revisited.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have several thoughts about bikes on trails, and obviously I compare
>>> that with dogs off or on leash. With both dogs off leash and bikes,
>>> there is a disturbance of the people on foot or on horseback. The
>>> walkers do not disturb the off leash dogs or the bicycle riders. The
>>> disturbance and lack of comfort caused is one way only : It bothers the
>>> walkers. I think that should be strongly considered. If bikes are
>>> allowed on all trails, will walkers stop coming? Where would they go if
>>> this resource that many have used for years is no longer usable for
>>> them? Especially during covid, folks appreciated the solace of nature
>>> unimpeded by noise or disturbance. The quietness is too important to be
>>> lost, because once it is lost, it will not be returning. I am hopeful
>>> that a classic Lincoln compromise can be made limiting bike use to only
>>> a few trails.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Colleen Katsuki
>>>
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to [email protected].
>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to [email protected].
> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to [email protected].
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to