On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:59:47AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 18 August 2017 at 11:52, Dai Xiang <xiangx....@intel.com> wrote: > > Cool, after use this kernel_cmdline, 4\5\6\8 can pass now, but 1\7\9 still > > can not: > > Why do you say that 4/5/6/8 have passed ? ### ### cpufreq_04: ### test the change of the frequency is effective in 'userspace' mode ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/PmQaSpecification#cpufreq_04 ### cpufreq_04: pass ### ### cpufreq_05: ### test 'ondemand' and 'conservative' trigger correctly the configuration directory ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/PmQaSpecification#cpufreq_05 ### cpufreq_05.0: checking 'ondemand' directory exists... Ok cpufreq_05.1: checking 'conservative' directory exists... Ok cpufreq_05.2: checking 'ondemand' directory is not there... Ok cpufreq_05.3: checking 'conservative' directory is not there... Ok cpufreq_05.4: checking 'ondemand' directory exists... Ok cpufreq_05.5: checking 'conservative' directory exists... Ok cpufreq_05: pass ### ### cpufreq_06: ### test the change of the frequencies affect the performances of a test program ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/PmQaSpecification#cpufreq_06 ### cpufreq_06: pass
cpufreq_08: pass > > > cpufreq_01.0/cpu0: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in > > '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq'... Err > > cpufreq_01.0/cpu1: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in > > '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq'... Err > > cpufreq_01.0/cpu2: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in > > '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq'... Err > > cpufreq_01.0/cpu3: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in > > '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq'... Err > > cpufreq_01.0/cpu4: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in > > '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/cpufreq'... Err > > cpufreq_01.0/cpu5: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in > > '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/cpufreq'... Err > > cpufreq_01.0/cpu6: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in > > '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/cpufreq'... Err > > cpufreq_01.0/cpu7: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in > > '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpufreq'... Err > > > > cpufreq_01: fail > > > > cpufreq_07.0/cpu0: can not reach a quescient point for 'ondemand'... > > skip > > cpufreq_07.0/cpu1: can not reach a quescient point for 'ondemand'... > > skip > > cpufreq_07.0/cpu2: can not reach a quescient point for 'ondemand'... > > skip > > cpufreq_07.0/cpu3: can not reach a quescient point for 'ondemand'... > > skip > > cpufreq_07.0/cpu4: can not reach a quescient point for 'ondemand'... > > skip > > IPMI BMC is not supported on this machine, skip bmc-watchdog setup! > > cpufreq_07.0/cpu5: can not reach a quescient point for 'ondemand'... > > skip > > cpufreq_07.0/cpu6: can not reach a quescient point for 'ondemand'... > > skip > > cpufreq_07.0/cpu7: can not reach a quescient point for 'ondemand'... > > skip > > > > cpufreq_07: skip > > > > cpufreq_09.0/cpu0: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1600000 KHz... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.1/cpu0: checking 'powersave' frequency 1600000 KHz is fixed... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.0/cpu1: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1600000 KHz... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.1/cpu1: checking 'powersave' frequency 1600000 KHz is fixed... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.0/cpu2: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1600000 KHz... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.1/cpu2: checking 'powersave' frequency 1600000 KHz is fixed... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.0/cpu3: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1600000 KHz... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.1/cpu3: checking 'powersave' frequency 1600000 KHz is fixed... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.0/cpu4: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1600000 KHz... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.1/cpu4: checking 'powersave' frequency 1600000 KHz is fixed... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.0/cpu5: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1600000 KHz... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.1/cpu5: checking 'powersave' frequency 1600000 KHz is fixed... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.0/cpu6: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1600000 KHz... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.1/cpu6: checking 'powersave' frequency 1600000 KHz is fixed... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.0/cpu7: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1600000 KHz... > > Err > > cpufreq_09.1/cpu7: checking 'powersave' frequency 1600000 KHz is fixed... > > Err > > I can see all of them fail and the reason is quite simple to see. Even > intel-pstate > doesn't provide a frequency table and so whatsoever depends on a frequency > table will fail. > > These tests aren't really meant for x86 stuff, sorry about that :( So with intel cpu, the 1/7/9 subtests always fail, right? They are not for x86, so which type of cpu or arch can enable them? > -- > viresh _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
