On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 2 December 2014 at 12:51, pi-cheng.chen <pi-cheng.c...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Add 2 new kind of event for running a memory or a io bounded load.
>> "mem" name for a load is memory bounded, and "iorun" name for a load is io
>> bounded. The default file to be written to create the load is /dev/null and
>> the device/file could be specified with "io_device" key in "global" section.
>>
>> E.g.
>> "tasks" : {
>> "thread0" :
>> { "sleep" : 1000, "run" : 100, "mem" : 1000, "sleep" 10000, "iorun" : 1000 }
>> },
>> "global" : { "io_device" : "/dev/ttyS0" }
>>
>> Signed-off-by: pi-cheng.chen <pi-cheng.c...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> src/rt-app.c | 74
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/rt-app.h | 2 ++
>> src/rt-app_parse_config.c | 23 +++++++++++++++
>> src/rt-app_types.h | 4 +++
>> 4 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
>
> Hi Pi-cheng,
>
> Sorry for troubling again. There are still few issues:
> - I thought it will look like this:
> [RT-APP][PATCH] Add IO-bounded and memory-bounded events
>
> @Amit ? Same is true for all other utilities like idlestat as well..
>
> The place where you have put rt-app now is reserved for the
> module within the repo to which the patch belongs. Not sure
> if rt-app repo has need of such modules though.
Sure.
> - There should have been somebody in the --to field, whom
> you want to review your patches.
>
> You don't have to resend it now.. :)
Pi-Cheng, for future postings let us just skip linaro-dev list and cc
sched-to...@linaro.org instead. And yes, adding at least one "real
person" in To field ensures someone will look at your patches.
Regards,
Amit
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
