All, Ok, thanks for letting me know. It's better news than it could have been, e.g. we don't want it mainlined or upstream doesn't want it.
A few months of work sounds like a bit much to take on as a side project at this point, and I have a few already, so no promises. But I am interested in hearing where the first thread is to start pulling at, so to speak. On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 1 November 2014 23:15, Ben Gras <b...@shrike-systems.com> wrote: > > My question is: is Linaro planning to upstream the bbxm code to stock > qemu? > > > > Having a single qemu would simplify life for us. > > Upstreaming that code is something we would in theory like > to do, but it is quite a lot of work required to clean it > up to the point where it is upstream quality, so at the > moment (and for the last several years!) more urgent/important > things have unfortunately taken precedence. (It's probably > a couple of months or more worth of work, depending how much > of the functionality you want to try to upstream. If anybody > wants to tackle the job I'm happy to give suggestions about > what needs doing.) > > -- PMM >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
