On 08/27/2014 06:09 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > With the switch to cbuild2 can we please get rid of the timestamp in the > filename? It causing me a lot of pain when updating the links. No one cares > on which day it was built and only leads to questions like "why is the BE > toolchain newer?" when the build crossed midnight :/
Just as a followup, the cbuild2 produced binary tarballs are named like this: (ignore the .99, it's just for testing) gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.99-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.99-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz.asc runtime-linaro-gcc4.9-2014.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz runtime-linaro-gcc4.9-2014.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz.asc sysroot-linaro-eglibc-gcc4.9-2014.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz sysroot-linaro-eglibc-gcc4.9-2014.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz.asc - rob - _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev