On 08/27/2014 06:09 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> With the switch to cbuild2 can we please get rid of the timestamp in the 
> filename? It causing me a lot of pain when updating the links. No one cares 
> on which day it was built and only leads to questions like "why is the BE 
> toolchain newer?" when the build crossed midnight :/

  Just as a followup, the cbuild2 produced binary tarballs are named
like this: (ignore the .99, it's just for testing)

gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.99-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.99-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz.asc
runtime-linaro-gcc4.9-2014.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
runtime-linaro-gcc4.9-2014.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz.asc
sysroot-linaro-eglibc-gcc4.9-2014.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
sysroot-linaro-eglibc-gcc4.9-2014.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz.asc

    - rob -


_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to