On 13 November 2013 14:48, Matthew Gretton-Dann <matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 13 November 2013 10:02, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> From: Deepak Saxena <dsax...@linaro.org> >>> Date: 12 November 2013 07:25 >>> Subject: Running Linaro toolchain on ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 >>> To: Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org> >>> >>> >>> I'm working on getting my new build system up and running and with >>> 13.10. Running any of our toolchain commands leads to "No such file or >>> directory". I'm guessing this has to with my system being x86_64 and >>> 13.10 no longer including ia32_libs package, but could be incorrect. >> >> Yip. This is due to lack of /lib/ld-linux.so.2 which is included in 32-bit >> libc. >> >>> If this is indeed the issue, my understanding is that I need to >>> manually install 32 bit versions of every library that's needed. Can >>> toolchain folks comment on this? Any possibility of getting 64 bit >> >> Yip. You have to manually install 32 bit versions of every library >> that's needed. >> >>> native binaries or just having a repository that we can install from >>> and thus auto-pull the dependent 32 bit libraries? >> >> We need support both 32-bit and 64-bit systems. Ubuntu is not the only >> Linux host we want to support. We also support Debian, Fedora, >> openSUSE and RHEL. > > Just to confirm what Zhenqiang says - the requirement on the Linaro > Toolchain Binaries are for them to support running on any standard > Linux distro - Intel 32- and 64-bit hosts. > > To keep the validation level to acceptable levels we chose to ship > only 32-bit host-binaries as these will run on all systems. >
What ever happened to the Linaro toolchain PPA? Surely, by hooking the Linaro periodic release directly into APT, we could dodge these dependency issues completely? -- Ard. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
