On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 15:01 +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Not really, its actually intentionally designed like this > since its > pointless rebuilding gcc-cross multiple time just because we > want to use > it with a different sysroot. We therefore just pass in the > arguments to > the compiler to ensure it uses the right one. If you remove > them, you > hit the problems you describe. > > We should probably compile in a bogus sysroot so it never > works and > makes this kind of issue more visible. > > hmm. ok. i see. it would certainly help to have a better 'error' > message... i suppose that not having a builtin sysroot at all, would > be an even bigger problem as it would default to /usr/include... > > Right, that would be even worse than a poisoned one... Cheers, Richard > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
