On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Green <andy.gr...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 16 August 2013 08:22, Mike Turquette <mturque...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm interested in looking at some Bluetooth stuff on my OMAP 4460
>> Panda ES. Looking at the bug reports I don't see any Jelly Bean
>> releases that have BT working properly on Panda. Is this correct?
>>
>> Can you please point me to a release where BT and display/hdmi are
>> working for Panda? It's OK if it is ICS.
>>
>> I'm OK starting with binaries but I would much prefer to be able to
>> build from source and reproduce any known-good bins. I have already
>> built JB from the latest tip as well as the 13.07 manifest (display is
>> working fine but BT doesn't work, bugs already filed). I tried the
>> 12.07 Panda LEB (which I think was the last ICS release?) but the
>> binaries supplied did not have display working even after running the
>> install-binaries-4.0.4.sh script.
>
> Nicolas Dechesne may be able to help more directly, but mainline BT
> was never workable reliably on Panda.

That's disappointing since an article on omappedia references the
Linaro release and says, "Note: Wifi, bluetooth, YouTube, jpeg, video
playback (both .mp4 and .3gp), and audio playback (both .mp3 and .aac)
all have been verified as working in this release." You can see it
here:

http://www.omappedia.com/wiki/Android_Panda_Build_Source#Building_from_Linaro

>
> The p-android stuff on omapzoom was meant to have numerous patches
> that actually made it work.  At one point we talked to some guys from
> TI and got some patches, however they were patches against
> p-android-3.0 that not only did not apply on mainline but were 100%
> patching code that anyway did not exist in mainline, so we got
> literally nowhere with it.
>
> The p-android stuff are busy history trees, so it is very hard to
> extract a coherent series that "fixes bluetooth".  Even to do direct
> diffs at file level isn't easy since the files have all moved around
> and the 3.0 one we know worked is radically different than current
> mainline anyway.  Some of the issues were down to PM related stuff and
> the p-android arrangements for that bear no relationship to mainline.
>
> Anyway Nicolas may know more, but the best bet may be to find a TI
> Alumni who worked on it and get the skinny.

Nicolas, any inputs?

Thanks,
Mike

>
> -Andy
>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linaro-dev mailing list
>> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to