On 23 May 2013 11:43, Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.deche...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Fathi Boudra <fathi.bou...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> >> >> That's something to discuss... We don't have "customers". The >> >> engineering builds are done to support our engineering effort, in the >> >> fastest and cost effective way >> >> The hwpack concept is still valid but not as it used to be (hardware >> >> specific abstraction). We still want to have a single hwpack that >> >> works for the supported distributions. >> > >> > "We still want" - Well I'd like to see the list of "we" ;) >> >> As you know, I'm in the list and I'm also the one doing the work so I >> guess my vote counts ;) > > well, as far as I am concerned and for my project i don't think that using > hwpack will make sense, and would prefer to go with an OE native approach, > even though we will support multiple BSP/SoC, that will be managed with > dedicated BSP layers. I will participate in the hwpacks v4 discussions at > connect though to align with you guys.
Your call (not only ;) I suspect your project has some stakeholders requirements around OE native approach). I'm guessing you'll have to make some adjustments if you want to submit your pre-built images jobs to LAVA. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
