In LNG you could end up with an interesting mix of preempt RT and deadline patches making the analysis and benchmarking interesting to interpret. In addition there are discussions about adding zero overhead linux (ZOL) like features.
Mike On Friday, May 17, 2013 6:08:20 AM UTC-4, David Rusling wrote: > > Amit, > an interesting proposal. I think that most of the LNG steering > committee is on this alias, but just in case, I'm adding them to it... > Dave > > Amit Kucheria <javascript:> > 17 May 2013 10:15 > Hi all, > > As part of our investigations into the Linux scheduler we've > interacted with Juri Lelli at the University of Pisa (cc'ed) who is > part of a group that is working on a DEADLINE scheduler[1] for > Linux[2]. > > While we're coming at this from a power managment angle[3], I suspect > that LEG and LNG already have real-world usecases that would benefit > from deadline scheduler found in other RTOSes. > > So I think it makes sense to merge Juri's tree into linux-linaro going > forward to allow easier experimentation. Does LEG and LNG have any > interest in this at this point? > > Juri has expressed an interest in maintaining a current branch of the > code that could be merged into our monthly release. In return, real > world usecases will improve his chances of getting the code merged > into mainline. > > Regards, > Amit > > [1] http://retis.sssup.it/?q=node/35 > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/11/373 > [3] Mostly involving discussions at this point, no real engineering > effort invested yet > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-dev mailing list > linar...@lists.linaro.org <javascript:> > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev > > > -- > David Rusling > CTO > Linaro Ltd > e. david....@linaro.org <javascript:> > w. http://www.linaro.org > Linaro: The future of Linux on ARM >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
