I'm not entirely comfortable with blindly white-listing anyone who posts to
linaro-dev with something that doesn't look like spam, for several reasons:

1. That is not a great way to run a moderated mailing list.
2. IT aren't going to be in the best position to say whether or not the
sender *should* be able to send to linaro-dev, even if they didn't send
spam.
3. The whitelist is going to start getting *very* big very quickly,
reducing the effectiveness of the mailing system and of the moderation
function.

This may need a bit more thought, I suspect. I suggest that there should be
more than one non-IT person with administrator access to the list so that
the moderator queue can be checked more frequently that is currently being
done at the moment.

Philip


On 20 February 2013 05:49, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 20 February 2013 11:00, Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Yes, the moderator lets these emails in and whitelists known upstream
> > developers upon request. Please let Anmar or Philip know any such
> > email addresses.
>
> Okay. I got this.
>
> But what i requested was a bit more than that... In current case somebody
> has
> to ask moderators to whitelist few mainline developers, but many a times
> when
> we are in cc of original mail, we don't realize that mails aren't
> reaching everybody
> on list.
>
> The idea i had was, moderators should monitor all the mails which aren't
> being
> delivered to our lists, check if they are spam or not, in case they aren't
> spam
> (which is pretty easy to find), add senders mail id in whitelist (or
> whatever it is called).
>
> That would make things work quickly and would be much more efficient.
>
> --
> viresh
>
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to