Le 25 janv. 2013 13:00, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweis...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > 2013/1/25 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org>: > > This sequence is not the right one > > > >> I'm going to look for the saved trace to check the sequence above > > > > I haven't been able to reproduce the bug that this patch was supposed to > > solved. The patch 2 and 3 seem enough to fix the nr_busy_cpus field. I will > > continue to try to reproduce it but it seems that it was a side effect of > > the 2 others fixes of the series > > Ok. I just checked again as well and I can't find a scenario where > this can happen. If you find it out or trigger the bug again, don't > hesitate to resend this patch.
Ok. I'm going to update the patch serie without this patch Thanks > > Thanks.
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
