On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 16:08 +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Thank you very much for your feedback.Considering your suggestions,I have > posted out a > proposed solution to prevent select_idle_sibling() from becoming a > disadvantage to normal > load balancing,rather aiding it. > > **This patch is *without* the enablement of the per entity load tracking > metric.** > > This is with an intention to correct the existing select_idle_sibling() mess > before > going ahead.
Well, on the bright side, this is much kinder to light load tbench on 4x10 core (+ht) box than current bounce happy select_idle_sibling(). At the heavy load end I'm losing heaping truckloads of throughput though, likely some migration rate limiting would fix that up. select_idle_sibling() doesn't have much of a pretty face these days, but its evil hag face shows more prominently than ever, so making it dead is a great goal ;-) -Mike _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
