On 25 October 2012 02:44, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 13:15:58 Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> There were few sparse warnings due to mismatch of type on function arguments.
>> Two types were used u64 and cputime64_t. Both are actually u64, so use u64 
>> only.
>>
>> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
>
> This series appears to be based on your "cpufreq: governors: remove
> redundant code" patch that hasn't been applied yet.
>
> Please rebase it on top of linux-pm/linux-next or on top of v3.7-rc2,
> whichever is more convenient, and resend.

Please apply it after applying the latest cpufreq: governors patch i have sent.

--
viresh

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to