On 09/26/2012 10:32 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:02:14 +0100
> Sangwook Lee<sangwook....@linaro.org> escreveu:
>
>> This patch adds driver for S5K4ECGX sensor with embedded ISP SoC,
>> S5K4ECGX, which is a 5M CMOS Image sensor from Samsung
>> The driver implements preview mode of the S5K4ECGX sensor.
>> capture (snapshot) operation, face detection are missing now.
>> Following controls are supported:
>> contrast/saturation/brightness/sharpness
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sangwook Lee<sangwook....@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki<s.nawro...@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Francesco Lavra<francescolavra...@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Scott Bambrough<scott.bambro...@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Homin Lee<suap...@insignal.co.kr>
>
> ...
>
>> +static int s5k4ecgx_load_firmware(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>> +{
>> + const struct firmware *fw;
>> + const u8 *ptr;
>> + int err, i, regs_num;
>> + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
>> + u16 val;
>> + u32 addr, crc, crc_file, addr_inc = 0;
>> +
>> + err = request_firmware(&fw, S5K4ECGX_FIRMWARE, sd->v4l2_dev->dev);
>
> The patch looks correct on my eyes... Yet, calling request_firmware()
> might not be the right thing to do. The thing is that newer versions of
> udev refuse to load firmware synchronously during probe/init time.
>
> As this function is actually called by s_power, maybe this driver doesn't
> suffer from that new udev behavior, so, I'll be merging it as-is. However,
> I suggest you to take a deeper review on that and, if possible, test it with
> the latest udev.
True, it's indeed a bit tricky. The host interface driver this sensor driver
has been tested with calls s_power on a subdev only in response to a video
device open(). During probe only subdev's .registered() callback is called.
And there is no request_firmware() there, as it is not needed to boot the
sensor's MCU. The "firmware" is really just a set of settings that are
normally needed only before streaming needs to be started. We have analysed
this issue and hopefully there should be no request_firmware() calls from
within probe(), as long as the host interface driver doesn't call s_power
from it's probe() callback. I'm afraid it's not the case for all bridge
drivers though. If needed we could probably try and use
request_firmware_nowait(), but it seems better to me to make sure the bridge
drivers don't call s_power from within their probe() callback.
--
Thanks,
Sylwester
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
