On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 06:11 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On tickless system, one CPU runs load balance for all idle CPUs. > The cpu_load of this CPU is updated before starting the load balance > of each other idle CPUs. We should instead update the cpu_load of the > balance_cpu. > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org> > --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++++++----- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 1ca4fe4..9ae3a5b 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -4794,14 +4794,15 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(int this_cpu, enum > cpu_idle_type idle) > if (need_resched()) > break; > > - raw_spin_lock_irq(&this_rq->lock); > - update_rq_clock(this_rq); > - update_idle_cpu_load(this_rq); > - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&this_rq->lock); > + rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu); > + > + raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock); > + update_rq_clock(rq); > + update_idle_cpu_load(rq); > + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); > > rebalance_domains(balance_cpu, CPU_IDLE); > > - rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu); > if (time_after(this_rq->next_balance, rq->next_balance)) > this_rq->next_balance = rq->next_balance; > }
Ew, banging locks and updating clocks to what good end? -Mike _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
