Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:16:55PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:59:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Adding Jiri and Steven to the CC list. > > > > Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:50:31PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov escreveu: > > > On 05/15/2012 07:51 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > >Em Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:27:39PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov escreveu: > > > >>are there any thoughts on how much of the perf.data is portable and how > > > >>much it should be? > > > >>I'm interesting in recording scheduler activity on one machine and then > > > >>replaying on > > > >>another. As I can see, replaying x86 perf.data on ARM doesn't work. At > > > >>least, should it > > > >>work with a small subset of recorded events (for example, > > > >>sched:sched_switch, > > > >>sched:sched_process_exit, sched:sched_process_fork, sched:sched_wakeup > > > >>and sched:sched_migrate_task) on the same architecture? > > > > > > > >Endianness issues? ARM EB? There are some patches by Jiri Olsa that may > > > >help you if that is the case. > > latest version sent today, there's description of tests I did: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133715172512742&w=2 > > Each time I run new sort of test, another endianity issue is hit. > so, tracepoints.. I'll check ;)
The tracepoints part is a different problem, I think, but take a look anyway ;-) - Arnaldo _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
