On 04/10/2012 01:23 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>  writes:

This patchset makes some cleanup on these cpuidle drivers
and consolidate the code across both architecture.

Thanks for this really nice cleanup.  I have some comments on specific
patches, but here's some general comments:

Some minor comments:

First, please be sure all patches have a descriptive changelog.  Yes,
even simple ones need changelogs.  In particular, maintainers are
looking for the "why" of a patch, not just the "what" or "how".

Second, this series introduced a couple sparse warnings:

/work/kernel/omap/pm/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c:134:1: warning: symbol 
'omap4_idle_dev' was not declared. Should it be static?
/work/kernel/omap/pm/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c:136:23: warning: symbol 
'omap4_idle_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?

Ok, I probably missed it. I will fix that it in the next version.

Thanks for reviewing.

  -- Daniel

--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to